Landfill Leachate Treatment Using Nanostructured Polymeric Membrane in Adsorption Osmotic Membrane Bioreactor

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Babol Noshirvani University of Technology

/amnc.2019.8.31.7

Abstract

In this study, the combination of chemical, biological and membrane processes was investigated for landfill leachate treatment. In order to reduce the contamination level, the chemical coagulation process was used by coagulants such as aluminum sulfate and poly aluminum chloride. Also, the optimum pH range and concentration of the coagulant were determine following by the biological process of activated sludge. Finally, the leachate separation of the aerobic bioreactor was carried out by FO-MBR membrane process and the effect of powder activated carbon adsorbent was studied on this process. The results showed that the amount of COD in leachate decreased by 48% after pretreatment using coagulants (optimum concentration of 1 g / l and pH = 8). Then, the COD removal rate reached to 24% by using the aerobic activated sludge process under optimum aeration conditions, F / M = 0.312 COD / MLSS.d ratio and 24h hydraulic retention time. In the last section, the usage of synthesized cellulose membrane in form of the frame and plate modules immersed in the aerobic bioreactor of the FO-MBR process, was examined. Furthermore, 2 g / l powder activated carbon adsorbent was used to improve the performance of this process and the reduction of membrane fouling, which improved the performance of the landfill leachate wastewater treatment system by increasing the COD removal rate from 74% to 92% as well as the changes in MLSS concentration during the 4-day FO-MBR process increased by 24% compared to the absence of adsorbent.

Keywords


[1] Bazrafshan E, Kord Mostafapoor F. Survey of medical waste characterization and management in Iran: a case study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Waste Manag Res. 2011; 29(4): 442-450.
[2] Zazouli MA, Yousefi Z, Eslami A, Bagheri Ardebilian M. Municipal solid waste landfill leachate treatment by Fenton, photo-Fenton and Fenton-like processes: Effect of some variables. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2012; 9(1):3.
[3] F, Moulin P. Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater. 2008; 150(3): 468-493 xidation processes. Chemosphere. 2004; 54(7): 997-1003.
[4] Oman CB, Junestedt C. Chemical characterization of landfill leachates-400 parameters and compounds. Waste Manag. 2008; 28(10): 1876-1891.
[5] Yousefi Z, Zazouli M, Mohammad R, Ghorbanian Aleh Abad M. The Effect of anaerobic baffled reactor modified by anaerobic filter (ABR-AF) on solid waste leachate treatment. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2011; 21(89):27-36.
[6] Alvarez-Vazquez H, Jefferson B, Judd SJ. Membrane bioreactors vs conventional biological treatment of landfill leachate: a brief review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2004; 79(10):1043-1049.
[7] Jamali HA, Ghahramani E, Abouee E, Sadeghi Sh. Evaluation of Poly Aluminium Chloride efficiency in removal COD, TSS, color and turbidity of wastes landfill leachate in Qazvin city in 2011. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2014; 6(3):581-589.
[8] Rivas FJ, Beltran F, Carvalho F, Acedo B, Gimeno O. Stablized leachate: sequential coagulation–flocculation + chemical oxidation process. J Hazard Mater. 2004; 116(1-2): 95-102.
[9] A comparison between Moringa oleifera and chemical coagulantsin the purification of drinking water – An alternative sustainable solution for developing countries M. Pritchard ,T. Craven, T. Mkandawire, A.S. Edmondson a, J.G. O’Neill , Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 2010; 35: 798–805
[10] YingDong ZhiweiWang ChaoweiZhu QiaoyingWang JixuTang ZhichaoWua A forward osmosis membrane system for the post-treatment of MBR-treated landfill leachate, Journal of Membrane Science, 2015.
[11] Murat Eyvaz, Taha Aslan, Serkan Arslan, Ebubekir Yüksel & İsmail Koyuncu , Recent developments in forward osmosis membrane bioreactors: a comprehensive review,2016.
[12] J.S. Zhang, W.L.C. Loong, S.R. Chou, C.Y. Tang, R. Wang, A.G. Fane, Membrane biofouling and scaling in forward osmosis membrane bioreactor, J. Membr. Sci. 2016; 403: 8–14.
[13] W.J. Yap, J.S. Zhang, W.C.L. Lay, B. Cao, A.G. Fane, Y. Liu, State of the art of osmotic membrane bioreactors for water reclamation, Bioresour. Technol. 2016; 122: 217–222.
[14] Elizabeth A. Bell , Ryan W. Holloway, and Tzahi Y. Cath , Evaluation of forward osmosis membrane performance and fouling durin long-term osmotic membrane bioreactor study,(2016).
[15] S. Judd, The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment, Elsevier, 2010, 0080967671.
[16] Eaton, A., L. S. Clesceri, et al. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
[17] Maleki A, Zazouli M A, Izanloo H Rezaee R. Composting plant leachate treatment by coagulation flocculation process. American Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2009; 5:638-43
[18] Tatsi AA, Zouboulis AI, Matis KA, Samaras P. Coagulation flocculation pretreatment of sanitary landfill leachates. Chemosphere. 2003; 53: 737–44.
[19] Nguyen TPN, Yun E-T, Kim I-C, Kwon Y-N. Preparation of cellulose triacetate/cellulose acetate (CTA/CA)-based membranes for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science. 2013; 433:49-59.
[20] Zoheir Dabaghian, Ahmad Rahimpour, Mohsen Jahanshahi, Highly porous cellulosic nanocomposite membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis desalination, Desalination. 2016; 381: 117–125
[21] Ong RC, Chung T-S. Fabrication and positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) characterization of cellulose triacetate membranes for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 2012
[22] Benefield, L.D., (1984), process chemistry for water and wastewater treatment, Prentic - Hall Inc., New Jercy,